I was so affirmed by this subjective experience and evidence of how my unconscious works.
I (my life purpose and contribution) felt affirmed by how my intuition guesses this aspect of how we work (EsSample). My intuition guest this aspect what I previously produced from much less experience.
I (my innermost) felt affirmed from the reality of the experience, and from the realness with which the unconscious feels and speaks.

(continued from S D Z)
So the remarkable stunning thing was how it did all of this journey, and strong responses, without needing or being able to tell the conscious what was happening. And my conscience is along for the ride, picking up only strong movements below the surface, but without any models (words, concepts, feelings) from those strong movements.

Also remarkable is how all of this is consistent with EsSample. That the unconscious only models, and has no channel to the conscious. It lives a life of its own down there. And the conscious has its own separate sense organ on models (entities, relates) managed by the conscious, including self and all relates. And this management is of tokens of those models, because the unconscious continues to host and actually do the modelling. So the conscious has a protocol (without much awareness) to suggest a model or a relate, pass the package to the unconscious.

And the unconscious does what it can to fulfil the request to model, and presumably replies in that same protocol in a very limited way. For example, 1) it does nothing (” doesn’t compute “), or 2) it constructs a model and replies ” yes, model done ” and the conscious parks that token in memory, together with connections to other tokens. Or it replies 3) ” pattern already exists, now connected with these other models in a way which creates a new model which I’m also replying “, and the conscious receives and tokenises that a new model. It’s what we call insight and intuition.

(It is these tokens and connections which the conscious calls from memory, assembles, and asks the unconscious to reply what these models do in the assembly suggested. Again, the unconscious reply is one of those three ways. I like how useful the analogy of Google request applies. We have to select the appropriate words (again these are tokenised models) in a priority order for Google to reply what it can, in the order you’ve prioritised. Google will reply no hits, matching hits, or hits of related relevant matches. ).

(Chomsky’s language element works in this grey area between conscious and unconscious. The conscious formulates a model of what it wishes to articulate, again tokenised, and requests the unconscious serve up, and articulate through voice, the best match it can. Again, the Google analogy applies. Your response (to the articulations served up) has equivalent to your own attempts to think of the word or articulation that your voice has just spoken. For example yes, good match that is exactly what I mean, or no, that’s not quite what I meant to say.)

Your conscious has two channels of communicating with the unconscious. This attention-model channel, and the physical environment. For example, when you are trying to identify a feeling or thought you have, and you cannot retrieve from memory the appropriate idea (tokenised model or models), then presence of the label (token) or model (words or diagrams or images) in the environment can be read in directly by the unconscious (without much assistance from the conscious). And the unconscious will give one of those three replies. For example, you experience this when someone asks you what you are feeling, but you cannot identify the name or what it relates to. So having someone ask can “are you feeling A? ” No. ” Then perhaps are you feeling B”. Yes, that’s what I’m feeling!